I recently heard that one orchestra had their tuba player — who had little to play in a particular piece — tweet messages to audience members during the concert. That's one example of the new buzzword for the performing arts: engagement.

With smart phone constantly on, our new arts consumer (we’ll call him/her Chris, for unisex reasons) goes out into the world with at least two guises: Chris the Consumer and Chris the Reporter. Chris the Consumer buys the tickets. Chris the Reporter tells the world about the event on Facebook, Twitter and Foursquare. Nonstop. Before, during and after the experience. OMG.


We in the performing arts are now faced with a dilemma: how do we handle Chris the Reporter at, say, A Christmas Carol after Chris the Consumer has purchased a ticket? Chris the Reporter wants to share that experience. With friends. While it’s happening. LOL.

We in the arts very much want Chris the Reporter to share the experience, especially if he is having an “awesome” time. We are far less inclined to welcome her using her smart phone appendage during the performance to do so. In fact, didn’t we insult Chris at the top of the performance by asking him to turn that phone off? :-(

The arts are by nature immersive and we ask patrons to give themselves over to the experience. Chris, the bifurcated patron, refuses to give up her Reporter persona. That’s part of Chris’ experience.

Artists and companies, we now hear, are amending their artistic product to accommodate our two Chrises. They’re offering shorter performances because Chris has a busy life and a shorter attention span than his parents or grandparents. And, frankly, understands story far more intuitively, so we can indeed cut to the chase.

But what do you cut from Fiddler on the Roof without defying copyright laws? How do you incorporate cameras into The Nutcracker set to give Chris close-ups on her smart phone that won’t damage the illusion of a 19th century world? How can characters in White Christmas tweet from a post-World War II Vermont lodge without destroying the willing suspension of disbelief that underpins a whole world of theatrical literature?

Do we really need to rewire our understanding of artistic experiences because Chris wants electronic as well as visceral interconnectivity with a performance? IDK.

I know I’m becoming a curmudgeonly luddite, especially since I view my lower IQ phone as a necessary nuisance. I confess I don’t know how to deal with Chris as the house lights are dimming and he still wants to see that reassuring glow from his smart phone. I’d prefer to see Chris give her undivided attention to the performance and gush or bash later. Personally, I think Chris would enjoy it more. But I still read newspapers.

Where do you sit on this question? Do you want engagement opportunities at a performance, in Popejoy Hall or anywhere else? What kind? What about before or after a performance? What kind of engagement do you want then?

Chris and I both want to know.

Terry S. Davis
Popejoy Hall

Views: 1

Tags: Carol, Christmas, Nutcracker, Popejoy, Twitter, White, engagement, facebook, phone, smart, More…tweet

Comment by Aux Dog Theatre on February 25, 2011 at 5:36pm
There are so many ways in which technology can isolate us.  I think that fact is causing a renaissance of community spirit and immersion into the arts.  We should welcome the ways that "Chris" uses devices to bring us together.  Chris is the future.

Comment

You need to be a member of Duke City Fix to add comments!

Join Duke City Fix

Connect with Us!

Regular Features

• "Sunday Poetry" with The Ditch Rider

Johnny_Mango

• Daily Photo by Dee

• "Morning Fix" with Adelita, Hettie, Phil_0 and Masshole in Fringecrest

DCF Flickr Photos



items in Duke City Fix More Duke City Fix photos

© 2014   Created by MarketPlace Media.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service