In "Lonely are the Brave," a movie made from the book, "The Brave Cowboy", by Edward Abbey, Kirk Douglas rides his palomino, Whiskey, across the Albuquerque west mesa toward
DukeCity, in
Bernal County. It was filmed in 1961 and today the western horizon looks much the same. The ancient volcanoes, lava flow and City open space bound the western edge of the city. But this is changing. Developer SunCal hopes to build beyond the volcanoes.

The outcome of last Tuesday's election could have an impact on this. Three incumbants lost their seats: Shannon Robinson, Dan Silva and James Taylor. All three supported TIDD subsidies for SunCal.
Parnelli Gonzales at
Clearly New Mexico called it an earthquake:
In Albuquerque, the ground opened up and swallowed three supposedly unbeatable Democratic warhorses - and most significantly two powerful committee chairmen. All three of them were beneficiaries of a Roundhouse culture fueled by copious gratuities from lobbyists and gobs of campaign money from industry special interests. All three of them were roadblocks to reform.
Contrast this with the sad little sour grapes tone in the
Albuquerque Journal story last week about the South Valley losing seniority where City Councilor Ken Sanchez said Dan Silva's departure will be a "huge loss."
But within the same Journal story is this:
State Rep. Miguel Garcia, D-Albuquerque, said another change could come from the newly elected legislators' ideologies. He pointed out that Griego and Chavez won on platforms that identified Silva and Taylor as being too cozy with business interests and criticized the incumbents' support of tax breaks for SunCal, the developer that purchased the old Westland Corp. property on the West Mesa. "I think you're going to see a more populist direction of resources," Garcia said, adding that he thinks grass-roots community issues will get more attention.
All I can say is, 'What would Whiskey think?'
once land is "developed," be it with a big box store, a housing community, a parking lot, or whatever, it is nearly impossible to go backwards and "undevelop" it--it will most likely never be natural again. once the space is designated as "developed," then the only thing that changes is the type of development on said site. it is my fervent wish that developers were required to follow a code of ethics similar to that of doctors and other healthcare workers, i.e. "first, do no harm." the amount of power anyone who calls him- or herself a "developer" has is far too great in this country, as they become the de facto arbiters of the environment that the rest of us are forced to live in.
having said all this, i believe that the entire atrisco land grant sale was criminal on myriad levels. this particular land will always be better off left alone--there is more than enough development going on in and around the city to make up for leaving it as it is (and too scant natural resources to sustain such a development). i know very well this will not happen, as i am neither suncal nor a developer (and obviously i would make a very poor developer), and it hurts me to think about the future of this site.